The Tantrum, Part 3: Why Can’t Jews Just Ignore Santa

JewishChristmas_2010-333x400As a (half) Jew, I pity poor St. Nick. These thing my colleagues are calling him–the fat pagan stealing cookies, the superstar holiday perv-lush who forces children to adore him–these are not his fault. These are our fault.

Yes, I’m going to point the finger right back at Jews, along with Gentiles. The only reason Santa Claus has grown so obese and indolent is that America has become a deranged post-consumption society, where every emotion can be invoked or evaded by one form of purchase or another.

It’s nothing new to say that Christmas has become commercialized, but can we Jews really complain that this is being foisted upon us? Think about the places over the last century where Santa, children and greed became fused into the single cultural unit they are today: beyond the (many) places run by Gentiles, you have to count the foundational department stores named after the Jews who ran them: Gimbel, Magnin, Kaufmann, Saks, and May. And then there are all those Jews who wrote lovely Christmas songs. So you can’t single Jews out, but the corpulent, powermad Santa Claus we know today is a product of American enterprise, and Jews are an integral part of that enterprise, so I think we should cool down the kvetch.

And, now that I’m done slagging my (chosen) people, let me do one worse and praise, umm, German Catholics. Yes, they gave the world Emperor Palpatine Cardinal Ratzinger, but they don’t have nearly as many of those hardcore rightwing wafer-deniers as we do here in the U.S. And this latest suggestion from the Bonifatiuswerk charity group based in Paderborn is a real mitzvah. According to the Telegraph:

The Bonifatiuswerk of German Catholics – a church aid organisation – has begun calling for “Santa Claus-free zones.”
The organisation sees Santa as “an invention of the advertising industry designed to boost sales” and as “a representative of consumer society who has little to do with the historical figure of St Nicolas.”
Because of his linkage with commercialism the group says he should be banished and replaced with the more charitable, and traditional, St Nicolas.
St Nicolas, the patron saint of children, is described on the group’s website as “a helper in need who reminds us to be kind, to think of our neighbours, and to give the gift of happiness.”

It’s all part of Germany’s own struggle with gluttony. My favorite story from a friend of mine over there was about the origin of Advent Calendars. The calendars these days are a series of doors, one for each day from Dec. 1 to Christmas, each door with a treat–usually a piece of chocolate–behind it. In other words, a perfect kid item. But apparently, in the more impoverished days of Germanity, the real advent calendar was a series of chalk marks on the wall. Just mark each day, like a prisoner counting out his sentence, until Christmas. One Dec. 6, you’d get a visit from St. Nick, who came under a few different ridiculous pseudonyms–Aschenmann, Bartl, Boozenickel, Hans Trapp, Klaubauf, Pelznickel, Ruhklas, Schmutzli–and arrived with little gnomic thugs with names like Knecht Ruprecht or Krampus (depending where you live), who threatened you with a stick.

All that terror would lead up to the final day, Christmas, on which you might get your present: an orange.

Now think about it, Jews. Our Chanukah is much closer to this older version of Christmas than it is to America’s current Christmas. And that’s kind of a great thing. Our traditions are a little intense, about war and redemption (and possibly, as I argued yesterday, circumcision). The meals are humble. The focus is storytelling, something that kids love almost as much as chocolate. Let Christmas slide off the cliff of insanity. In the end, it makes everyone else look more reasonable.

The Spinagogue!

Warning: while the video below looks like it was produced in 1942 with Internet gerbils spinning a fiber-optic power wheel, it’s not. Major League Dreidel exists, people participate–there’s one guy who calls himself the “Spintuation” (get it?)– and believe it or not, I’m actually devoting a section of my book to trying to understand the importance of these kinds of ironically Jewish competitions and events. For now, though, please enjoy the sight of a plastic toy munching on a potato pancake.

Are We All Just Rapists in Waiting?

daddy-daughterWell, yeah, probably—according to both society and biology. Exhibit A: The New York Times’ Motherlode blog, which today features the hemming and hawing of the fabulously named Nicole Sprinkle, who when she’s not starring in golden shower videos can’t make up her mind whether to hire a 23-year-old man with good references as a babysitter:

I told him frankly that I liked him best of all and yet still wasn’t sure I could make the leap of letting a man watch my daughter: one who might have to help her wipe, clean her up in case of an accident, who would be alone with her everyday for several hours.

I also told him that I felt really awful about having to feel this way, and that it was such a shame that society forced us to discriminate against kind, competent men as caregivers for our kids. Yes, I know that statistically a man is far more likely to molest a child than a woman but, really, what is the likelihood of it happening to your child when the potential caregiver comes replete with recommendations that you trust and a personality and career path you admire?

You might think from reading the above that she’s about to say “To hell with society!” and hire the guy. But no. She bows to (imaginary) pressure and goes with someone else—someone she doesn’t like as much as him. Wow.

Now, I think I may have written something about our irrational fears of child molesters before, but it bears repeating: CHILL OUT! Also, if you want to hire a male babysitter but lament how society forces you to discriminate, and you wish it were some other way, why not try hiring a male baby-sitter? Seeing more guys out there taking care of kids can only help the situation. Sheesh.

Although, actually, maybe Ms. Sprinkle (oh, god, how I love saying that!) is right. Maybe we men are dangerous beings, bent on raping whatever is at hand. After all, according to our favorite source for parenting news, women “avoid their fathers when they are at their most fertile to reduce risk of inbreeding.” Yes, that’s correct. The reason your teenage daughter doesn’t want to be near you half the time is because she’s afraid you will get her pregnant. Should that come as a surprise?

Of course, the researchers at the University of Miami “conceded that the high-fertile women might simply be avoiding their fathers because fathers might be keeping ‘too close’ an eye on potential male suitors.” Sounds reasonable. But it’s much more likely that they have a built-in genetic fear of rape rape rape! Watch out! The men are coming to rape everything in sight! Panic! Panic! Panic!

Who Lacked Such Armor and Swords As They Would Have Wished

Judah the Hammer leads his shorn Army into battle
Judah the Hammer leads his shorn Army into battle

Since today is the first day of the eight you might know as Chanuka/xанука/חֲנֻכָּה‎, I decided to stop flaming up the Dancing with the Stars chatrooms just long enough to track down the Old Testament chapters that talk about why exactly we should play with our dreidels.

I give you, then, 1 Maccabees Chap. 4. It is, of course, total warporn, about a battle fought at Emmaus (which I thought was in Pennsylvania—maybe the Mormons are on to something with this whole Jesus-was-in-America thing). You might know that Chanuka celebrates the rededication of the temple “profaned” by the army of Gorgias. How exactly was it profaned? I wish I knew. It was bad enough that the Jews stood around and tore their shirts off, threw themselves to the ground and poured dirt on their heads. I can only think the Gentiles must have pooped on the altar or something.

But the tastiest bits, which come earlier in the story, point to perhaps another of meaning of Chanukah:

During the night Gorgias came into the camp of Judah, and found no one there; so he began to hunt for them in the mountains, saying, “They are fleeing from us.”

But at daybreak Judah appeared in the plain with three thousand men, who lacked such armor and swords as they would have wished.

They saw the army of the Gentiles, strong and breastplated, flanked with cavalry, and made up of expert soldiers.

Judah said to the men with him: “Do not be afraid of their numbers or dread their attack.

Remember how our fathers were saved in the Red Sea, when Pharaoh pursued them with an army.

So now let us cry to Heaven in the hope that he will favor us, remember his covenant with our fathers, and destroy this army before us today.

All the Gentiles shall know that there is One who redeems and delivers Israel.”

You’ll see a few things. One, Judah sounds kind of like a jihadi here. Repeat after me, children: war is not the right way to teach people about God. But secondly, and forgive me if this is just my preoccupation, but this reads a lot like a story that’s really about circumcision. Seriously. Judah faces the Gentiles with three thousand men “who lacked such armor and swords as they would have wished”? Any Jew who has been in a European locker room (I spent a year of high school in Germany) knows that feeling. Gentiles are indeed breastplated and flanked with cavalry, if you know what I mean. Not that Judah was particularly ashamed: he must have been known as Judah the Hammer for a reason.

But still. Given that the Bible is essentially an oral history whose parables and characters changed a bit with each reciting, like a Holy game of telephone, I’m beginning to wonder where this “Gentiles” appellation comes from. Sounds a lot like genitals. Gorgias genitals.

Maybe the sons of Israel were concerned about this whole circumcision thing much earlier than I thought.

Happy Chanukah, everyone.