Babies, Bike Lanes, and Bitches

realdadwagon
Out of our goddamn way!

If you live in New York City, you probably wish every day could be like yesterday: cool but warm, sunny but tinged with fall colors, decelerating as Thanksgiving approaches. For me, though, it held a bittersweet quality: I can’t imagine there will be that many more such days this year when I can bike over the Manhattan Bridge—in shirtsleeves!—to pick Sasha up from preschool.

That’s partly because, according to some local paper, there is a growing backlash against bicyclists here. “More than 250 miles of traffic lanes dedicated for bicycles have been created” in the past four years, says the story, and some people are not at all happy about it. Most of those people, strangely enough, drive cars:

“He’s taking away my rights as a driver,” Leslie Sicklick, 45, said of Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg. Ms. Sicklick, a dog walker and substitute teacher, grew up driving with her father around the Lower East Side, where she still lives.

Sorry, I should translate for those of you unfamiliar with New York:

“He’s taking away my rights as a driver,” whined Leslie Sicklick, an entitled 45-year-old with a really crappy job who insists on owning and driving a large vehicle in one of the densest urban zones in America.

Obviously, as an official Kings County-certified hipster, I have to come down on the bike side of things. In the past several months, I’ve become addicted to tooling around my neighborhood and the city on two wheels, often with the kid riding on my handlebars. (Not literally, of course.) And at the same time, I’ve learned to rail against the many indignities visited upon us cyclists: cars parked in bike lanes! unmaintained bike lanes! people on crosswalks! inadequate bike parking!

Oddly, this parallels the feelings I have as a pedestrian—I’ll walk where I damn well please, and these cars better not fucking hit me!—and as an occasional rental-car driver: Who the fuck are these people crossing the street and whizzing at me on their Schwinns?

Which is to say: My basic rule is, Stay outta my goddamn way! Getting around New York, whether by foot, by bike, or by car, has always been an every-man-for-himself race, a form of semi-organized chaos that, every once in a while, works beautifully. Jon Stewart, I remember, once called the merging of traffic at the entrance to the Holland Tunnel a sign that human beings can function together peacefully. But not everywhere is the entrance to the Holland Tunnel. In fact, most places are like what the Wall Street Journal recently described:

Pedestrians who routinely jaywalk and stand in bike lanes; a woman pushing a man in a wheelchair down the protected bike lane on Broadway; a bike messenger racing through a red light on Sixth Avenue; cars that use bike lanes as passing lanes; wrong-way cycling along the protected lane on First Avenue.

All that said, the anti-cyclists remind me of the anti-child people in general—railing at an imposition that’s really not much of an imposition at all. And I have news for all of them: If biking becomes a big problem here, I’m going to have to take Sasha on our overburdened, overcrowded, unmaintained subway system a hell of a lot more often, and nobody will be happy. If you want peace of mind, you’ll improve the bike lanes, drive carefully, and, when you see a poorly painted Bianchi speeding through lower Manhattan or downtown Brooklyn, a toddler on its handlebars singing “Old MacDonald,” you’ll Get. Out. Of. My. Goddamn way!

Noises Off (I beg you)

VeryTired_big
Yet another stolen DadWagon image

Now this is all going to come across as complaining, and I’m not, really I’m not. First, Tomoko has done nearly 100 percent of the heavy lifting with young Ellie to date, at least at night. She’s breast-feeding the little dickens, and well, there isn’t much I can do to contribute on that front. So, basically, I’m getting plenty of sleep these days, and life is generally good.

And yet now I will proceed to complain with a certain annoying bitterness.

What the hell was going on in my house last night? Holy moley, it was like a construction site. A brief rundown:

1. Well past midnight and baby is crying.

2. Well past midnight and JP is suffering from a mystery cough and also complaining that he is hot in his pajamas with the feet and can he please just sleep in a short-sleeved t-shirt which has become a recent obsession and what’s with little boys being hot all the time it’s driving me fucking crazy.

3. My mother is in town to meet and greet the baby. Terrific. Now can she stop snoring like a wounded animal? I mean, I have a two-story apartment and the din still penetrates.

For those of you keeping score at home that’s three noise complaints in Brooklyn that have nothing to with traffic or aggravated assault.

Serenity now!

The End of the New Math

the-countIn a couple of weeks, Sasha will officially turn 2 years old, and when that happens, an important if annoying era will come to an end. I’m speaking, of course, of the frustratingly precise way in which we parents always answer the question, “How old is your child?”

Why is it frustrating? Because the question is most often asked by another parent who wants to compare, even if only implicitly, their kid’s development with yours. Is their 13-month-old taller than your 14-month-old? Can their 7-week-old hold her head up better than your 6-week-old?

For new or non-parents, this is how precise children’s ages are supposed to be:

• In the first 48 hours, you must say exactly how many hours old the child is.

• Days 2–10: Measure by the day.

• Day 11 through Week 13: Age is measured by the week; half-weeks are acceptable up through week 4, but after that it’s unseemly to do so.

• Week 13 through 11 months: Finally, your child is aging by the month! You may be tempted, however, to say things like “Oh, she’s 6 and a half months old,” but please don’t. No one cares.

• Month 11 through Month 13: Your child is one year old. God, isn’t that easy to say?

• Month 13 through Month 18: Count the months, but take pleasure, eventually, in saying your kid is “A year and half.” Feels nice, doesn’t it? So general, so imprecise—so grand-sounding, almost. Don’t get used to it.

• Month 18 to 2 years: This is the most frustrating time. Your kid is no longer “a year and a half,” and counting the months seems ridiculous now, an anal-retentive imposition. And yet you kind of have to; 20 months is not the same as 22. But thankfully, as you get closer to 2, you can just say (as I do), “She’s almost 2.” Who cares how close to 2? No one.

• Two years and up: At last, you can count by half years! Kids are 2 until they’re 2 and a half; then they’re 3. And so on. Around 9 or 10, if I remember correctly, even the half-years cease to matter. And then, one day in the distant future, they’re adults! And that’s when you begin counting how many years you yourself have left, making sure you take advantage of every year, month, week, day and hour. That is, if you don’t have Alzheimer’s.

MicroTantrum: Battle of the Bris

[Editor’s note: DadWagon has been paying attention to the petition circulating in San Francisco that aims to outlaw circumcision. Not only are we all “marked in the flesh” as part of our increasingly tenuous covenant with G-d, but two of us have had to decide, for our own sons, whether to continue the tradition. Here, in our MicroTantrum, DadWagon’s three editors weigh in on the relative merits of Making the Cut.]

Nathan: Over at TheStir, one mom wrote about how she deferred to her husband, who insisted that their boy would feel “different” if his penis looked different than his father’s. I’m fairly unconvinced by that argument. I don’t really spend a lot of time crossing swords with my 2-year-old or otherwise engaging in activities where we just look at each other’s junk. And I also don’t know that a difference in foreskin status would really stand out that much anyhow. Not to be a braggart, but the biggest difference between us is size (he is two, after all). And then possibly skin tone–as I’ve written about before, my son is 50% less white than I am. However, in the wake of talking to people behind the San Francisco petition, I do have a new ambivalence about circumcision. The thing that really got me: the realization that it’s cosmetic surgery, which seems a weird way to start off life unless you really feel strongly about this covenant-with-God idea. However: now that my first son is circumcised, it would be weird, right, to leave a second one unshorn? It would seem to invite the idea that one is favored by God. So there I am, trapped by an earlier decision that may quite possibly have been a mistake. Which is actually what raising kids is all about to begin with.

Theodore: Let’s go there, shall we? I am, to the use the parlance of certain communities found both in San Francisco and my part of Brooklyn, “cut.” As is my boy, JP. I must admit to having spent zero time investigating the health benefits or drawbacks to circumcision prior to allowing JP’s bit of man-meat to be taken from him. I just did it! Or, rather, I let our Chinese-American ob-gyn just go ahead and do it, and then… I panicked. What if he did it wrong? What if he took to much stuff? I should apologize to the doc (the very same one who delivered Matt’s Sasha) for my lack of confidence. His work was exemplary, as far as I can tell (I haven’t seen that many pricks with which to compare JP’s). As perhaps you can tell by this meandering stretch of narrative, I’m not tormented about the ritual, religious mutilation of little boys. It’s just one of the many stupid things we do as part of our culture. Really, my only thought was that JP’s thing-a-ling should look mine, thereby avoiding questions from him. Unfortunately, it seems pondering the pecker is inescapable in this day and age, as evidenced by this post. Shame on you, Nathan.

Matt: Before I say anything else, I am required to announce that my bris was a particularly joyful event—it took place the day of Richard Nixon’s resignation. Okay, now that that’s out of the way, there seem to be two things at issue for the San Francisco “intactivists” (which is an awesome nickname, by the way): 1. “Sensitivity.” Sure, it’s logical that by snipping away the foreskin, you’re losing some pretty damn sensitive material. But does that ruin what’s left over? Personally, I’d say no. I’m perfectly happy. And historically, given my gender’s many thousands of years of pursuing sexual gratification at all costs, I’d say that if circumcision were really that much of a hindrance, we would’ve given it up within minutes of Abraham’s death. 2. Consent. Can you believe we’re doing this allegedly horrible thing to our children without their knowledge and permission? Yup, I can. Just like I require my daughter to wear socks and shoes to go outside, just like I get her vaccinated, just like I make sure she’s fed three times a day, whether she likes it or not, I do things without her consent, and even against her will. She’s a kid, that’s the way it goes. Tough shit. But, and this is all anyone really ever cares about, would I get my hypothetical son cut? Yeah, probably—especially so if it is definitively proved that circumcision leads to bad sex. Why should my kids have it any better than me?