Pointy-Headed Kids and the End of Play

Your son on No Child Left Behind
Your son on No Child Left Behind

Interesting/disturbing numbers taken from a report by the Alliance for Childhood (did they spend much time coming up with that name?) called “Crisis in the Kindergarten: a new report on the disappearance of play”:

Minutes of standardized test prep, on average, that New York and Los Angeles kindergartners undergo each day: 24
Minutes of unstructured playtime they have: 25

(Yes, I know that’s in Harper’s Index language, but it’s my language. It also means I know the number is solid, as one of my incredible interns confirmed it.)

A lot of parents worry about sending their kids off to school for the first day. Here’s an example of why they’re right to. Turning our kids into soulless study robots in order to support a testing-based theory of educational “accountability” that has nothing to do with learning and everything to do with politics… sucks.

Closing of the American mind, anyone? Or are we hoping to work our kids into a test-prepped fugue state, similar to the one into which our NYC School Chancellor Joel Klein has slipped?

(Case in point: Klein recently claimed that only 1 percent of parents thought their kids did too much test prep at school. Response to this by one parent: ““That’s unbelievably ridiculous. You… are either in denial, or you’re trying to pretend to be in denial. I thought it was just a given you knew how much test prep was going on.”)

Neither one sounds particularly good. For all they are learning at school, might as well let the kiddies overdose on television and chocolate bars. And I’m not just saying that because that’s my parental philosophy.

Better Living Through Embarrassment

Our little guy is just at the point (8 months old) where he is about to start picking up sociobehavioral cues, and my wife and I are mortified at what he’s going to see. Yes, we think of ourselves as fairly upstanding urban citizens. We live within our means, we don’t let the bathrooms get entirely disgusting before cleaning them, and we buy Greenmarket vegetables. But there are a few things that … well, they aren’t ideal. A few too many dinners (after the baby’s asleep) get eaten in front of the television instead of around the dinner table, for example.

So my wife and I are starting to agree that our soon-to-be-sentient tot is going to be our route to self-improvement. Because the one thing that’s less palatable than missing Mad Men is raising a kid who thinks dinnertime is TV time. Neither of us can tolerate that (and besides, schedule-shifting is why God created the DVR). As soon as he might pick up on what we’re doing … that’s when we stop doing it. For real, we promise — no ifs ands or buts.

This leaves us only with the bad behaviors we don’t recognize. And I’m sure he’ll home on those in no time at all.

Beer, Bongs, Bedtime Stories

I did not expect to find, while I was reporting on an arch-Communist playwright in Berlin, a children’s book for my 3-year-old daughter. But I did, for a very Eastern Bloc price of just €6. The author of poems like “Venus and Stalin,” Peter Hacks also wrote children’s stories. This one, The Bear at the Hunter’s Ball, is his most famous.

It’s an inappropriate book for little ones on a few levels. It’s the only book on Dalia’s shelf that is also a Stalinist allegory mocking Khrushchev’s fecklessness. But that goes over her head. What I found a little harder to explain in reading is all the drunkenness: from the first page, where the bear dressed as a hunter stumbles through the woods after having had a couple shots of Bärenschnapps (“made of honey, vodka and heavy spices”). Then he meets a drunk hunter, they stumble to a drunken hunters’ ball and drink huge amounts of beer (“the Bear drank an amount that was like a floodwater that tears a bridge from its moorings”). Then, in a stupor, they all stagger out to find a bear to shoot. Hilarity ensues.

Did I mention this is my daughter’s favorite book? Yes, the googly-eyed illustrations by Walter Schmögner are brilliant. But she loves the story, even though I give her a somewhat lame G-rated version: I tell her the bear and the hunters are just REALLY happy to have so much juice.

Maybe that’s the right thing to do, maybe not. I have a feeling many parents would just hide the book. When she’s older, it could make a great springboard for talking about drinking: After all, they may be super-happy, but they make absurdly bad decisions. That’s drinking in a nutshell. But at what age would that be a good idea? 8? 10? 13?

She’ll certainly have noticed me drunk before then, if she hasn’t already. But I don’t feel a great need to walk her through my own drinking so much as preparing her for hers.

It reminds me of a far less successfully executed book that I used to keep conspicuously placed on my Time magazine office bookshelf, perhaps as a way of planting my flag as a native Californian — It’s Just a Plant: A Children’s Story of Marijuana.

It’s an intensely didactic book, published about five years ago but still selling as a bit of a cult classic. As one Amazon reviewer put it, though, it’s far better as a gag gift for parents than as something you’d actually read to your kid. The story: young daughter wakes up to find her parents smoking weed, and the next day (Halloween, no less), the parents walk around the city with her explaining what a normal and natural plant marijuana is, complete with toking yutes on a street corner who explain why they like to get high, and a cop who comes up only to tell everyone that dope may be illegal but good people are trying to change those laws. Ugh.

If there is a book out there like The Bear at the Hunter’s Ball — clever, engaging, entertaining — but with weed instead of beer, I might go for it. You don’t have to make a virtue of it, but weed happens, so you also don’t have to totally shield a kid from its existence (although don’t give them too much secondhand smoke, dumb-ass).

Either way, at this age, reading is healthy, right? Even if it’s about the unhealthy things adults do.

My Son Will Be an Uneducated Sap

Hate to say it, J.P., but the chances of your getting an education similar to the private, prep-school one that I received are nil.

I went to a fancy Upper West Side private school, where I received advanced instruction in insider trading, pasta kneading, and the ethical justifications for moral lapses. The cost to send my son to the school that I attended runs to $28,000 per year, starting in kindergarten. Technical term for that? Highway Robbery. (See also: are you out of your fucking mind?)

Why won’t J.P. be receiving his fair share of this part of the intellectual American Dream? Well, let’s start with my career choices. My mother is a doctor and my father is a consultant for a large corporation. I work for a dying industry, and earn—I think this is the technical term for it — bupkis (from the Yiddish for “your ass is broke”; alternate spellings: bobkes, bopkes, bubkes, bupkes, bupkiss, bupkus; see: nada, poverty, disgrace).

Still unclear? Perhaps a photographic hint will help.

dadhobo

Without being too specific, 28 G’s is a fair chunk of what I make annually; and given my soon-to-be ex-wife’s stated desire to take my money, my home, and my dignity (I get to keep the dog), and drive me into the sea, I’m thinking the public schools are improving under Bloomberg (or so they would like us to believe).