Attachment Included

One of the chief joys of parenthood is watching your child change. Partly this stems from realizing that we adults are now pretty much what we’re always going to be, that change for us is done, and that now when things do change, it’s unlikely to be for the better.

But with the kids, their changes are fascinating—abrupt and startling, but somehow logical. What’s Sasha’s latest big change? She’s getting attached to things.

I’m sure this is predicted by all the baby books I should’ve read, but it’s amusing nonetheless. It began with her stuffed dog—Gou-Gou—whom she hugs and cradles every night as she goes to bed. Then she added Xiao Mei Yang, the stuffed sheep, to her other hugging arm. In her waking hours, she’ll sometimes drag them around the apartment, not playing with them exactly, but holding on tightly.

Now, though, she has a new object of obsession: a toy stroller. We don’t buy her toys often at all, but she’d been pushing other things (boxes, chairs, tables) around the house so much we knew we needed to get a toddler-size pushable with wheels. Hence the stroller.

Which she adores. She’s loathe to part with it at all. She drags it everywhere, and would pull it into the bath or her crib if we let her. It’s sweet to see her so enthusiastic, but also worrying, long-term. Or maybe not worrying—it’s a challenge. Ideally, we’ll calculate her attention span just right, so that the instant she tires, fully and finally, of one toy, another will arrive to take its place in her imagination.

The trick is that “fully and finally.” We don’t want to shoot too early and wind up getting her new things constantly. But kids like and need the challenge of new objects; mastering them helps their brains develop.

If I were a scientist, I’d start charting the number of minutes per day she spends with the stroller, and track the inevitable fall-off with an eye toward predicting the next cycle of interest and boredom. Then I’d publish the chart here for all other parents to make use of.

But I’m not a scientist. I’m a writer and blogger, so I’ll just talk about it here and hope one of my readers has a solution, or at least a funny comment to make.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by Matt. Bookmark the permalink.

About Matt

Matt Gross writes about travel and food for the New York Times, Saveur, Gourmet, and Afar, where he is a Contributing Writer. When he’s not on the road, he’s with his wife, Jean, and daughter, Sasha, in Boerum Hill, Brooklyn.

3 thoughts on “Attachment Included

  1. um … no dice on getting rid of this one Matt, that’s my bet. My kids, boy (3) and girls (5.5 and 7), have been using those mini-umbrella strollers since they could walk relatively unassisted. And my eldest is still taking her baby out for the occasional walk under the cherry blossoms with that same stroller. In fact, so cheap and so in demand at our house, we … er … have 3.

    Now before anybody jumps on me for not teaching the “share” thing, my kids NEVER get stuff their siblings have, not to keep the peace, not for nuttin’. But … those strollers … they’re something! (And ours fold and hang, great in small spaces.)

    Maybe it is the modeling/copying thing? I gave a 2 yr old boy one for his birthday as it was the only toy he would play with over here. Um, his dad nearly had a coronary. Until I suggested that maybe, just maybe, he’s mirroring his hero, his dad, who pushes the stroller in their family. The toy stayed.

  2. Pushing the stroller is grand, no doubt, but let’s not forget the ramming that follows. Collisions are fun! Kids soon realize that ANY speed can be ramming speed!

  3. My little henny blog circle wrote about comfort objects recently in our own version of The Tantrum (ControverSundays) and I claimed Hank was completely uninterested in any given toy, blanket, etc. The very next day he took to a stuffed animal, and took to it hard.

    One piece of advice for parents whose children are about to hit the attachment stage: You might want to take one moment and think about what you name the objects (if your child is less verbal). Can you live with “Wubby” for instance? Do you go in for terse designators like “Bear”?

    H’s beloved is rabbit-like, but I’m not one to use the term “bunny,” so I named it “Mark.” No offense to the Marks of the world, but this name struck me as suitably ridiculous for a stuffed rabbit.

    But it stuck, of course, and H calls “Mar! Mar!” when looking for the thing. My partner shakes his head every time, because, well…Mark? Really?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *